Never Give Up After a Trademark Rejection: A Powerful Legal Tool in China

Never give up

By Skye Zou

Trademark registration in China is fast-moving but highly competitive. While the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) has accelerated examination timelines, rejection rates remain significant. Many businesses rely on the review (appeal) procedure when their applications are rejected. But here lies a subtle yet powerful legal tool: the principle of “changed circumstances” (情势变更).

This concept, though not directly mentioned in the Trademark Law, plays an important role in improving the chances of success during review or subsequent litigation.

Why Trademarks Get Rejected

Rejections typically fall into two categories:

  1. Absolute grounds: when a mark is descriptive, deceptive, functional, or otherwise prohibited (e.g., contrary to public order). These rejections are not about other parties’ rights but about the mark itself.

  2. Relative grounds: when the applied-for mark conflicts with earlier rights, most commonly an already registered or pending trademark considered identical or confusingly similar.

For relative grounds, the conflict often hinges on whether the earlier cited (“blocking”) trademark remains valid or enforceable.

The Principle of “Changed Circumstances”

“Changed circumstances” refers to situations where the legal landscape that led to rejection has shifted by the time of review or litigation.

For example:

  • The earlier cited mark was not renewed and expired;
  • It was cancelled for non-use over three consecutive years;
  • It was invalidated due to bad faith;
  • An opposition against it succeeded;
  • Or the cited rights were transferred to the applicant or co-existence agreements were signed.

In such cases, the earlier obstacle effectively disappears. Courts in China have recognized that refusing registration based on rights that no longer exist would be unfair and contrary to the purpose of the trademark system.

Why It Matters for Brand Owners

For Chinese and international companies, this principle has practical and strategic importance:

  1. A second chance at registration
    Even if CNIPA initially refuses a mark due to a blocking trademark, applicants can challenge the cited mark through cancellation, opposition, or invalidation actions. If successful, the review or litigation can rely on “changed circumstances” to clear the path.

  2. Timing is critical
    Trademark review has statutory deadlines. But if the cited mark’s status changes during review or later in court proceedings, that new fact can (and should) be considered. This prevents wasted investment in litigation over rights that have already disappeared.

  3. Strategic portfolio management
    Companies should not view a rejection as the end of the road. By tracking the status of cited marks and proactively acting against weak or unused registrations, applicants can turn a failed application into an eventual success.

Alignment with International Practice

The logic behind “changed circumstances” is not unique to China. In the U.S. and EU, expired, cancelled, or invalidated marks no longer serve as barriers to new registrations. Courts and IP offices routinely take into account the evolving status of cited rights.

China’s adoption of this principle demonstrates the system’s increasing flexibility and its willingness to align with international norms. This is encouraging news for multinational companies managing global portfolios.

Key Takeaways for Businesses

  • Don’t give up after a rejection. Many refusals can be revisited through review, cancellation, or litigation strategies.
  • Monitor cited marks. If a blocking mark is nearing expiry or vulnerable to non-use cancellation, that may be the key to unlocking your registration.
  • Use co-existence agreements carefully.  They can be persuasive, but courts will still assess likelihood of confusion independently.
  • Plan ahead. Trademark filing is not a one-step process in China. It’s a multi-layered strategy that requires foresight and legal risk management.

Final Word

The doctrine of “changed circumstances” underscores an important truth: a rejection today doesn’t always mean rejection forever.
For businesses in China, understanding and leveraging this principle can transform lost opportunities into long-term brand protection.

At Allasya Law & IP, we guide clients through these complexities, helping them assess rejection risks, challenge weak blocking marks, and build strategies that align with both Chinese and international trademark practice.