Changes to the Nice Classification from January 2026: Practical Implications

nice classification

by Fabio Giacopello

On 1 January 2026, the 13th Edition of the Nice Classification of Goods and Services entered into force. While updates to the Nice Classification are periodic and expected, this round introduces several structural reallocations of goods and services that merit careful attention from trade mark practitioners and portfolio managers.

For legal professionals advising on filing strategy, clearance, enforcement, and contractual risk allocation, the 2026 amendments are not merely terminological adjustments. They may affect scope assessment, conflict analysis, and drafting precision across multiple industries, particularly in healthcare, mobility, wearable technology, cosmetics, and AI-driven services.


 

The Function of the Nice Classification: Stability vs. Market Evolution


 

The Nice Classification system divides goods and services into 45 classes (Classes 1–34 for goods and 35–45 for services). 

Although classification does not determine the scope of protection per se (which depends on the wording of the specification), it plays a central procedural and strategic role:

  • Structuring applications and registrations

  • Defining examination parameters

  • Organising clearance searches

  • Guiding watch services and enforcement monitoring

Revisions aim to align the classification framework with technological development and market practice. The 13th Edition reflects a stronger functional logic: goods and services are increasingly allocated according to their essential nature and commercial perception rather than historical placement.

Key Structural Reallocations Under the 13th Edition

1. Eyewear Products: From Technology to Healthcare

Corrective spectacles, sunglasses, contact lenses, frames, sunglasses for pets and similar optical goods have moved from Class 9 to Class 10.

The reclassification reflects their medical or healthcare character, aligning them more closely with vision correction and therapeutic function.

However, technology-driven wearable devices such as smart glasses remain in Class 9, preserving the technological categorisation for electronically integrated products.


 

Practical implication:

Practitioners must now carefully distinguish between:

  • Optical devices as medical/healthcare products (Class 10)

  • Digitally enhanced wearable technology (Class 9)

This distinction will be particularly relevant for hybrid products that combine corrective function with augmented reality or AI interfaces.

For hybrid products with dual functionalities, it is advisable to file trademark applications in both Class 9 and Class 10, so as to respectively cover the smart technology interaction features and the vision correction medical attributes. 

This approach enables comprehensive protection across the product’s functional scenarios and commercial positioning, and helps avoid potential gaps in protection that may arise from registration in a single class.

2. Emergency and Rescue Vehicles: Functional Reassessment

Emergency and rescue vehicles (fire engines, lifeboats, lifesaving rafts) have been transferred from Class 9 to Class 12.

The shift corrects a long-standing inconsistency. These goods are vehicles by nature, and their prior placement in Class 9 (scientific and safety apparatus) was historically functional but conceptually imprecise.


 

Strategic consequence:

Clearance searches involving vehicle manufacturers or rescue equipment suppliers must now cover Class 12 in addition to legacy Class 9 registrations.

3. Electrically Heated Clothing: From Heating Apparatus to Apparel

Electrically heated clothing and accessories have moved from Class 11 (heating apparatus) to Class 25 (clothing).

The change reflects a consumer-facing understanding: the primary nature of the goods is apparel, not heating machinery.


 

Risk consideration: 

Fashion brands entering the wearable-tech segment must reassess filing strategies to ensure coverage in Class 25 rather than relying on legacy heating classifications.

4. Personal Care Devices: Medical vs. Household Distinction

Electric toothbrushes and tongue scrapers have moved from Class 10 (medical devices) to Class 21 (household or toiletry utensils).
 

Eyeglass cloths have moved from Class 9 (eyeglasses) to Class 21.  

The reallocation reflects market perception: most of these goods are consumer hygiene products rather than regulated medical instruments.

For enforcement purposes, this may alter the competitive landscape between oral care brands and medical device companies.

5. Essential Oils: Classification Based on Intended Use

Essential oils are now classified according to intended use:

  • Class 3: cosmetic use

  • Class 5: medical or therapeutic use

  • Class 30: food-related use

This functional approach increases precision but introduces evidentiary considerations. The applicant must be clear about the intended commercial positioning of the goods at filing. 

For multipurpose essential oil brands, multi-class filing strategies will often be advisable.

6. Optician Services: Commercial vs. Technical Segmentation

Retail-related optician services now fall in Class 35, while repair services move to Class 37. Previously, such services were often placed in Class 44.

This realignment better reflects service typology:

Retail → commercial services (Class 35)

Repair → technical maintenance services (Class 37) 

Existing coexistence agreements referring broadly to “Class 44 optician services” should be reviewed to ensure contractual clarity under the new taxonomy.

7. Artificial Intelligence as a Service: Formal Recognition

Artificial intelligence as a service (AIaaS) is now explicitly recognised in Class 42.

While many AI-driven services were previously covered under broader software-as-a-service terminology, formal recognition provides greater drafting clarity and reduces interpretative ambiguity.

For technology companies, this reinforces the importance of precise service definitions in Class 42 specifications, particularly where AI intersects with fintech, healthtech, and autonomous systems.

Transitional Rules and Legal Effect

The 13th Edition does not retroactively reclassify existing registrations filed before 1 January 2026. However:

  • New applications must comply with the updated classification.

  • Amendments, limitations, and refilings must reflect the new class structure.

  • Search and enforcement strategies must consider both historical and current classifications.
     

In practice, this creates a temporary dual-classification environment for affected goods and services.

Strategic Considerations for Trade Mark Professionals


 

1. Filing Strategy

Applicants filing on or after 1 January 2026 must ensure:

  • Correct class allocation

  • Updated terminology

  • Multi-class protection where goods straddle functional boundaries

Misclassification may lead to objections or inadequate protection. 

For goods involving cross-class reclassification, it is advisable to proactively file applications in the newly relevant classes to avoid potential gaps in protection.

2. Clearance Searches

Searches involving impacted goods should:

  • Cover both legacy and new classes

  • Include similarity assessments beyond strict class boundaries

This is particularly important in opposition and invalidation proceedings.

3. Watch Services

Watch notices should be updated to reflect the new allocations. Failure to adjust monitoring parameters may result in missed conflicting filings.

4. Contractual Review

Coexistence agreements, consent letters, settlement arrangements, and license agreements that refer generically to class numbers should be reviewed.

Best practice remains to define protection by reference to specific goods and services rather than class headings alone.

Broader Doctrinal Significance

The 13th Edition reflects an increasing alignment between classification logic and commercial reality. The Nice system, while administrative in nature, indirectly shapes:

  • Competitive proximity analysis

  • Consumer perception assessment

  • Scope drafting strategies

For legal practitioners, classification is no longer a purely formal step in the filing process. It is a structural component of brand architecture and risk management.

As product categories continue to converge (particularly in wearable technology, AI services, and multifunctional consumer goods) future revisions are likely to continue favouring functional and market-based allocation principles.

The 2026 changes therefore mark not just an administrative update, but a reminder: classification strategy is part of substantive trade mark protection.